What a Climate Deal (or Lack Thereof) Means for Women
Today global leaders reached a tentative deal on climate change at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen (Cop15), after two weeks of negotiations and much anticipation around the world.
According to Grist, President Obama warned that the agreement, which was limited and not legally binding, was “not enough” to curb global warming:
The deal came at the end of a day in which several drafts agreements were knocked back… Obama, whose presence was intended to provide the momentum to propel the deal over the finishing line, had earlier pleaded for unity while acknowledging any agreement would be less than perfect. The haggling capped two years of deadlock over crafting a new UN treaty from 2013 that would reduce global warming from mortal threat to manageable peril.
Scientists say failure to curb the rise in Earth’s temperature will lead to worsening drought, floods, storms and rising sea levels. The commitment to limit the rise in Earth’s temperature to no more than 2.0 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) falls way short of the demands of threatened island nations who, with their very existence threatened by rising seas, have called for a cap of 1.5 C (2.7 Fahrenheit).
‘Whatever the outcome, it looks bad for us,’ said a member of the Maldives delegation, an archipelago which fears being swallowed up by the Indian Ocean in a matter of decades.
But one major question that our leaders neglected to ask: How does this affect women? Studies show that women are 14 times more likely to die in natural disasters, as Riane Eisler writes for American Forum: Read the rest of this entry →

This past week has not been a pleasant one for the international LGBT community. Two separate attacks occurred during the 2009
Twitter
Facebook
RSS