The law defines gender in Australia: what’s new?
Back in August 2009, two trans men in Western Australia had requested to change the their birth certificates to show they are men without having hysterectomies (the surgical removal of the uterus) and won. But as UPI reported yesterday, the case was recently appealed where the Western Australian court ruled that transgender men are not men because they lacked “genital and reproductive physical characteristics.”
The Western Australian court needs a Gender 101 lesson. Let’s go over a simple fact: gender does not equal sex. Sex (such as male & female) is determined physical anatomy and biological description. Gender (for example: man & woman) is determined by social and cultural affiliations and is a learned behavior. Remember that back in 2008, for example, a trans man in the U.S. had a baby naturally–does that not make him a man?
If you’re reading this blog–most likely you are already know the difference between sex and gender. But I think it’s important to point out that determining gender via genital and reproductive characteristics is not only an ancient idea, but also has profound effects on those who live outside of gender norms. Read the rest of this entry →



Twitter
Facebook
RSS