• Survey
  • About
    • Mission
    • The GAB Team
      • Emily Heroy
      • Colleen Hodgetts
      • Kyle Bachan
      • Laura Beaulne-Stuebing
      • Tanya Castle
      • Avory Faucette
      • Atifa Hasham
      • Chally Kacelnik
      • Ashley Lauren
      • Amy Littlefield
      • Avital Nathman
      • Carrie Nelson
      • Nadia Smiecinska
      • Spectra Speaks
      • Henrike Dessaules
      • Fatma El-Nahry
      • Charlotte Jalvingh
      • Jessica Megarry
      • Imen Yacoubi
      • Leticia Zenevich
      • Contributing Writers
    • Newsletter
    • Copyright
    • Comments
    • Contact
  • Feminist Resources
    • Global Feminist Link Love
    • Series
    • Blogroll
Gender Across Borders
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Activism
  • Health
  • Education
  • Film & TV
  • Literature
  • Music
  • Queer Issues
  • Race/Ethnicity
It's survey time! We're working on an exciting new project here at GAB, and you can help! Click here for more information.

Who Needs Feminism? Everyone

January 19, 2012 7:00 am 4 comments

Share this Article

  • TwitterTwitter
  • FacebookFacebook
  • DeliciousDelicious
  • DiggDigg
  • StumbleuponStumble
  • RedditReddit

Author:

Nadia Smiecinska

Tags:

colonization Communism developing countries Eastern Europe feminism gender equality human development Nobel Peace Prize sisterhood
http://www.tunisia-live.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/download.jpg

Photo courtesy of Tunisialive.net

Who needs feminism? This is essentially the question asked by an article in the Guardian online about what that charged word means in a cross-cultural context.  Women’s rights are the main focus of the agenda from the Nobel Peace Prize to the World Bank’s Development Report. As the world continues to develop on an unimaginable scale we are faced with the need to address all types of inequalities because those inequalities affect us all. Since gender inequality is a good indicator of overall lower human development, improving women’s position in society helps to raise the general standard of living for all. With these facts in hand even conservative policymakers have jumped on the bandwagon of talking up gender equality because this sort of rhetoric is almost trendy at the moment. There appears to be a disconnect though between simply talking about gender equality and actually asking women to participate in their own emancipation, not to mention the lack of acknowledgement for feminism and its role.

The battles for feminist goals are ongoing in even the most developed and wealthiest parts of the world, as well as being in their beginning stages in developing nations, although there they may not always be called feminist. Feminism as a controversial label is present in the United States and the world, at the same time that people speak about women’s empowerment. The association of feminism with something very radical has made it an unpopular moniker and has made it clear that the basic notion of what feminism is has been lost. The distrust of feminist tenets seems to come from a lack of understanding of them and an assumption that if not radical it is still an idea that does not apply to women of certain religions, cultures, classes, races or ages. Feminism is quite simply a struggle for women to have the same rights as men do, no less and no more, in order for both sexes to take advantage of their full potential and opportunities. Ultimately this means that women have the necessary rights to make their own decisions, regardless of what they may be. In today’s society where popular culture tells us that we ladies have come a long way, which is true but not entirely accurate, feminism may appear as outdated or inapplicable. Similarly, in parts of the world where people are wary of yet another wave of Western colonization or where women’s liberation largely included ignoring female-specific needs, feminism and trans-cultural/transnational sisterhood may be less appealing.

A gender equality hungry world that is afraid of feminism is a product of  a lack of understanding for what feminism set out to do decades ago and semantics. The wariness towards the title “feminist” is not confined to non-Western cultures so addressing that feminism has always been by and for women, as well as, society at large has the potential to change attitudes. Furthermore, feminism’s goals today may look different on the surface in India, Russia, South Africa, Canada or Brazil because they operate under different circumstances. In a developed, rich, solidly democratic Western country feminists are likely in a different phase of their struggle than women fighting for change in a place where extreme poverty, disease and illiteracy are an everyday reality.

Feminist ideas about women’s empowerment and equality with men ring different to women in Western countries that only two decades ago toppled communist regimes which more symbolically than tangibly stood for women’s liberation. As Slavenka Drakulic wrote years ago in her book “How We Survived Communism and Even Laughed,” feminism seems irrelevant to women in former Eastern Bloc countries because the “equality” that Communist governments provided had more to do with deprivation and a certain humiliation specifically because they were women, like an inability by various Communist nations in the decades after World War II to produce an everyday product for their female comrades, a sanitary napkin. Not to mention the hardships faced by women who worked full-time in these economies of “equality” but had to endure long queues for very limited, basic products to simply feed their families. Certainly the arrival of democracy and market-driven economics has not solved the problems of women in the former Eastern Bloc countries but today it is these women who must continue to fight for what they want, on their own terms and with their own experiences. Governments and laws may put forth a vision for gender equality but until actual women are in positions that control decisions regarding women’s lives and choices, full gender equality will be a hit and miss. In places where in past times equality was more propaganda than fact or where liberation of any kind is brought in based on unfamiliar standards, the drive for what feminism is or ought to be will differ from how we may view it in the United States or even Europe. What women require is as much dependent on the time, as well as place, and not on the fact that some women are inherently different or wrong in their demands.

The demands of feminists came in waves over time in the Western world, first with suffrage, then with a demand for equal opportunity and continue today as women still do not enjoy the same equal opportunities as men. In all phases it was women who defined what they needed and wanted, based on their own experiences. Feminism in the global context is not absent, but rather exists in unique stages based on the realities of the women waging it. Over time the demands of women in a nation like India may mirror those of women in modern America, but regardless of when or where, it is the women who must make decisions for themselves. In the end feminism is something more misunderstood than actually controversial, like many other movements or ideas. The only way to ensure that women enjoy the freedoms and privileges they want for themselves is to have them be the ones that propel it, and that is precisely what feminism is, label or not.

Like Gender Across Borders on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter and Tumblr. Subscribe to our monthly newsletter. UPDATE: to take part in our survey regarding international feminism, click here.

4 Comments

  • Ariane
    January 19, 2012
    4:37 pm

    This is a great summary of the situation, thanks. I’d also like to add something you hinted at but didn’t say explicitly – the different phases in different places may also not be following the same path. For example, in the west, feminism has achieved a great deal with respect to gender roles, but has been less successful in achieving a reduction in violence against women. In other places, women may choose to work within gender roles to reduce violence. Different social structures create different imperatives making it very difficult to judge, from the outside, how “far along” a society is. None of us has got there yet, whatever “there” might end up looking like.

  • Renee Martin
    January 24, 2012
    5:47 pm

    Feminism is quite simply a struggle for women to have the same rights as men do, no less and no more, in order for both sexes to take advantage of their full potential and opportunities.

    That sentence highlights the major problem with this article. I am so sick and tired of feminists suggesting that we all need to be feminists without ever acknowledging the various schisms in the movement that have been harmful to marginalized women. There is a reason that womanists and radical women of color exists and this entire piece ignores the ongoing racism in the feminist movement.

    • Nadia
      January 25, 2012
      11:02 am

      When I write about feminism as a positive force it doesn’t mean that I don’t see its various problems, past and present (classism, racism etc). I do however like to highlight its merits because in today’s world the word/label has become so negatively charged and misunderstood. So often I hear comments like “I am not a feminist but I believe women should be treated/have the same chances as men etc” and I ask whether this initial disclaimer about not being a feminist comes from a misunderstanding of a large, multi-faceted movement or from something else. I agree that feminism, just like any other movement has its problems but simply disregarding it because it has problems isn’t fair. Today in the US (and in many other corners of the globe) we have a lot to thank feminists for (as well as women who did not explicitly identify with the label but fought for the same things). We should acknowledge the past and work to improve the movement, adapt it to today’s needs and and face the various ways where it still needs to grow. To me feminism is an inclusive movement (even if it has not always been exactly like that and if the struggle is still on). Just as an example I don’t write-off democracy because it used to only apply to men, marriage because it assumed women to be transferable property etc. As I point out it is the idea of women setting their own standards/goals and on their terms that I identify with feminism. The mere idea though of various movements by women for women (dubbed feminist), and for equal political, economic, and social rights regardless of sex is something worth praising.

  • Jacob Jonker.
    January 29, 2012
    3:46 am

    Few women who call themselves feminist have answered the question of what feminism stands for and what that means.There are many women who believe that equal rights,civil rights,human rights,peaceful coexistence and a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work,etc.,can be had within the patriarchal old paradigm.They are kidding themselves,or they are kidding others who believe these people to be feminists.
    Then there are women feminists who want to ‘overthrow’ or replace Patriarchy.Many of these women obviously don’t believe what they are saying.We know that by what they do and don’t do,how they live.They support Patriarchy because they know it is to their financial advantage.Other feminists are serious about changing society.They believe that society can be changed for the better by means of non-stop complaining,whining,pleading,protesting and working hard to support the system as it is.They don’t know how it works,nor have they the motivation to find out.They are kidding themselves.
    Women feminists in the West are in the best position anywhere,of all time to date,to influence affairs globally.Yet,they insist on following the patriarchal gravy train,begging and pleading,whining and protesting,instead of thinking for themselves.Weird.
    Women have politically neutered those men who are not part of the patriarchal establishment.Women keep sucking the teat they profess to detest.Women want to be women.Aye,they believe in the fairy-tale after-life.

Latest Global Gender Justice News

  • New Project! We need your help!

    New Project! We need your help!

  • Start Improving the World: Goodbye, Gender Across Borders

    Start Improving the World: Goodbye, Gender Across Borders

  • Global Feminist Link Love: April 21 – 27

    Global Feminist Link Love: April 21 – 27

  • Male, female, hetero, homo: does the binarism really exist or are we making it up?

    Male, female, hetero, homo: does the binarism really exist or are we making it up?

  • Essentialism, constructionism, and why I like plaid

    Essentialism, constructionism, and why I like plaid

  • Understanding my sexuality through queer theory

    Understanding my sexuality through queer theory

  • Dangers of identity politics: does science hold all the answers?

    Dangers of identity politics: does science hold all the answers?

  • Profile of a “Gaysian”

    Profile of a “Gaysian”

  • “Yes I am too, but am I really?” On queerness and socialization.

    “Yes I am too, but am I really?” On queerness and socialization.

  • Welcome to the series “Born this way? The role of the nature vs nurture debate in sexual identity formation and acceptance”!

    Welcome to the series “Born this way? The role of the nature vs nurture debate in sexual identity formation and acceptance”!

  • Unpacking my daddy issues

    Unpacking my daddy issues

  • Women’s Solidarity: Speaking With One Voice for Equality

    Women’s Solidarity: Speaking With One Voice for Equality

  • Report Addresses Gender Gap in London

    Report Addresses Gender Gap in London

  • Integration, Honor and Women in Germany

    Integration, Honor and Women in Germany

  • A Question of Royalty: How Black Princesses are Faring on the International Stage

    A Question of Royalty: How Black Princesses are Faring on the International Stage

  • Global Feminist Link Love: April 14-20

    Global Feminist Link Love: April 14-20

  • Women in the Middle

    Women in the Middle

  • Malawi: New President and New Media

    Malawi: New President and New Media

  • Illusions of Abandonment: Euro-orphans in Poland’s Immigrant Families

    Illusions of Abandonment: Euro-orphans in Poland’s Immigrant Families

  • Chasing Elusive Dreams: The Quandary of Zimbabwean Women

    Chasing Elusive Dreams: The Quandary of Zimbabwean Women

← previous next →
Gender Across Borders
  • Mission
  • Contact Us
  • Comments Policy
    search:
    © Copyright 2013 — Gender Across Borders. All Rights Reserved Designed by WPZOOM