• Survey
  • About
    • Mission
    • The GAB Team
      • Emily Heroy
      • Colleen Hodgetts
      • Kyle Bachan
      • Laura Beaulne-Stuebing
      • Tanya Castle
      • Avory Faucette
      • Atifa Hasham
      • Chally Kacelnik
      • Ashley Lauren
      • Amy Littlefield
      • Avital Nathman
      • Carrie Nelson
      • Nadia Smiecinska
      • Spectra Speaks
      • Henrike Dessaules
      • Fatma El-Nahry
      • Charlotte Jalvingh
      • Jessica Megarry
      • Imen Yacoubi
      • Leticia Zenevich
      • Contributing Writers
    • Newsletter
    • Copyright
    • Comments
    • Contact
  • Feminist Resources
    • Global Feminist Link Love
    • Series
    • Blogroll
Gender Across Borders
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Activism
  • Health
  • Education
  • Film & TV
  • Literature
  • Music
  • Queer Issues
  • Race/Ethnicity
It's survey time! We're working on an exciting new project here at GAB, and you can help! Click here for more information.

Studying Down: Thoughts on Sex Work, Steinem, and Self-representation

September 20, 2011 5:00 pm 17 comments

Share this Article

  • TwitterTwitter
  • FacebookFacebook
  • DeliciousDelicious
  • DiggDigg
  • StumbleuponStumble
  • RedditReddit

Author:

Guest GAB Contributor

Tags:

feminism Gloria Steinem Melissa Petro sex work Tsk Tsk: Stigma Shame and Sexuality Series

This post is by Melissa Petro and is part of Tsk Tsk: Stigma, Shame, and Sexuality, a series hosted by Gender Across Borders and cross-posted with RH Reality Check in partnership with Ipas.

Photo: Hank Zalen

I did not read Gloria Steinem’s article “I was a Playboy Bunny” in Women’s Studies 101, and as much as I would like to say that her ethnographic research inspired my own, this isn’t true. My research began the second semester of my second year at Antioch College. Prior to calling it “research,” it was just plain work.

At nineteen years old, I found myself in Oaxaca, Mexico, living as a student abroad. Three weeks into my trip—out of cash, my credit card having hit its limit—the solution seemed obvious. I became a sex worker, starting as a stripper at a club called La Trampa. I stripped on and off through college, sometimes thinking of it as research, sometimes— more honestly—not.

My junior year, I traveled to Europe where I interviewed prostitutes and other sex workers about their lives and professions. At twenty-seven years old, after a five year hiatus, I returned to the industry for a brief stint, this time as a call girl on Craigslist. Like Gloria Steinem, I consider myself a researcher, a writer, and a feminist. Unlike Gloria, when it came to researching sex work, as much as I would have wanted to have believed it then, I wasn’t “studying down.”

For some, sex work is about survival. They do it because they have to. While this may be true for some, some people perceive all women’s participation in the sex industry as a product of coercion. For me, this couldn’t have felt less true. Though circumstances had been a factor, the first time I stripped was no act of desperation. I made a choice.

Coming home from Mexico, I thought about all the reasons, besides money, I preferred my newfound occupation. Of all the jobs I’d had, stripping was by far and in many ways the best. It had the best uniform. I could make my own hours. And then there was the money. I preferred a job that so-called decent women wouldn’t even consider, I found myself thinking.

In Europe, while the other kids were out drinking and dancing, I transcribed my tapes in the evenings in the hostel, playing and rewinding the microcassettes. Speaking to other women about their lives and professions as sex workers began a process that went on for nearly a decade.

The sex workers I met and interviewed were regular women, their lives in all ways normal, despite what some might think. For many sex workers, including myself, it was “what some might think” that made our lives most difficult. The idea that sex workers are deviant, and  that our occupations are associated with drug use, sexually transmitted disease, mental illness, trafficking, and victimization is a lens through which all sex workers are seen and, I’d venture to say, through which we begin to see ourselves.

As my research revealed, sex workers employed various ways of distancing themselves from the stigmatized identity imposed upon them by their professions. Had I the courage to recognize them then, I could have seen examples of this in my own life. Sometime after my first night working at La Trampa, I called home from a pay phone across the street from my apartment. I told my mom I’d found a job babysitting. I talked on and on about how much it paid. I mean really, mom, it’s unbelievable. I took funny things that had happened in the club and I changed the setting. I made things up. Like so many women I had interviewed, when it came to those who loved me, I lied.

My mom, at the time, worked as a secretary at a racetrack. When I went away to college, she took a second job in retail to help cover the costs. She worked at a supplement store in a strip mall, peddling diet pills to girls I’d gone to high school with. Hanging up the phone that day, I pictured my mother in her polyester uniform, a name-tag pinned to her breast: Patricia. My mom liked my stories. She was proud of me. I never even considered telling her the truth.

Back at Antioch, I described my experiences in Mexico as “participant observational research.” On campus, I made no secret I had stripped. I wore it like a badge. On a campus that was sixty percent gay, I had stood out as ‘the straight girl.’ My first year, I was taught that my being heterosexual, not to mention white, was a privilege—but I had never in my life felt privileged. Finally, I thought, I had something about me that made me different, interesting. I had become a sex worker, the very term a political one. I argued that women’s participation in the sex industry was transgressive. Sex work had the potential of subverting the very paradigms it seemed to reinforce. More accurately, for me, sex work was a way to financial freedom, and that was empowering.

But in conversations about sex work, I spoke in the third person, too afraid to draw conclusions about myself. Whether it was the money or the attention, for the first time in my life I felt secure. In the club, if not in the real world, I was sexually desired. I felt in control. I felt valuable. In classroom discussions, I had become useful, quick to offer a unique and provocative point of view. Never in my working class life had I felt so seen. My research became my graduating thesis and was subsequently published in “Research on Sex Work” and in the anthology “Sex Work Matters: Exploring Money, Power and Intimacy in the Sex Industry.” Still, as much as I had hoped my interviewees could speak for me, I would not be satisfied until I had learned to speak for myself. Years later, I pursued an MFA in Creative Nonfiction from The New School, where my research began to take the form of memoir.

Only in writing my own story was I able to see its whole truth. My experience as a writer and activist is similar to my experience as a sex worker. Although initially empowering, everything I gained was not without consequence.

Last year, September 2010, I was removed from my job as a public school teacher for publishing an article on the Huffington Post in criticism of the censoring of the adult services section of Craigslist. I had wanted to make the point that some women, like I had, choose to sell sex, and that the conflation of consensual sex work with abusive sex trafficking does all individuals engaging in commercial sex– be they victims or otherwise– a disservice. Having done so before, though never for a site as visible as the Huffington Post, I thought nothing of speaking first-person and publishing under my name. Though I knew there was a risk for backlash, I assumed such speech was constitutionally protected, believing then– as I do today– that its political import outweighed any distraction it had the potential to cause the community within which I worked. As much as I underestimated the distraction my writing created, I overestimated the institutions I had assumed would defend its political importance, starting with the institution of feminism.

In response to my speaking candidly about my experiences and without a psuedonym, I was called a ‘moron’ and a ‘disgrace.’ My behavior was characterized as reckless and selfish, my mindset described as ‘depraved.’ From the way I was characterized, it was the act of representing myself that people found most offensive. One feminist blog called my apparent vying for attention ‘disgusting.’ Female reporters took issue with my bio, demanding to know how I could refer to myself as a feminist. An ex-whore attention whore? It was too much. A sleaze and a blabbermouth and an idiot but a feminist?

Feminism, as I see it, is a movement that fights for the rights and equality of women and while that definition is expanding to include individuals across a gender spectrum, it has always at least purported to include all women. Black and white, rich and poor, virginal or professional and everything in between, it is a feminist belief that whatever our experience, our experience is meaningful. The act of telling that story is a feminist act.

“Stories from each other’s lives,” Gloria Steinem once said, “are our best textbooks. Every social justice movement I know of has come out of people sitting in small groups, telling their life stories, and discovering that people have shared similar experiences.”  Whereas sex workers are largely excluded from conversations about their own lives, thus alienating them from the category of feminism, in my eyes there is no woman more imperfect—and, thus, more feminist—than the unrepentant whore.

Considering the pain I caused myself, this past year I often wondered what I could have done differently. In the end, I realize I could not have done anything differently but to have said or done nothing at all. As Rebecca Traister put it recently in a NY Times article on contemporary feminist activism: “The standard response to any public attempt by a woman to upend expectations of consent, passivity and silence – whether she does it calmly or hurredly, in court or in fiction… – is still that she is a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty.” For sex workers engaging in the media, this is particularly true. We are talked about ad nausea but not allowed to speak. When we do, no matter what we say or how we say it, it is bound to come out wrong. I say, speak anyway.

Today, one year later, I have no regrets—not about my past, not about speaking out. I am thirty one years old, no longer a child. As the product of all my choices and experiences, I am entirely comfortable with the woman I’ve become. I am a daughter, a sister, a girlfriend. I am somebody who is loved. I am a former sex worker. I am still, and will always be, a teacher. Today my life is filled with opportunity because I have the imagination to believe this, and though not without consequence, this is all because I worked in the sex industry— not in spite of it. A victim of poverty, a victim of sexism, a victim of stigma and discrimination— a victim of my own poor judgment, at times, perhaps— but a victim of sex work, I was not.

Melissa Petro has written for The Huffington Post, Daily Beast, Salon, Rumpus.net and elsewhere. She is a regular contributor at xojane and this month’s guest blogger at Bitch Magazine, where she authors a column on representations of sex work in the media. She teaches creative writing at Lehman College, Gotham Writers Workshop, and Red Umbrella, an organization that empowers sex workers to represent themselves. She holds a BA from Antioch College, an MFA from the New School and a Masters in Education from Fordham University.  Contact melissa.petro@gmail.com.

Like Gender Across Borders on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter and Tumblr. Subscribe to our monthly newsletter. UPDATE: to take part in our survey regarding international feminism, click here.

17 Comments

  • GemmaM
    September 20, 2011
    5:36 pm

    Thanks for your story. I’m touched by the honesty with which you represent yourself and the way you felt about your sex work. Knowing that there are wonderful, complex people like you who are unfairly stigmatized by sex work is really inspiring to those of us who want to change that.

  • Stephanie Keil
    September 20, 2011
    5:48 pm

    Research has shown that 80% of prostitues were sexually abused (Google “sexual abuse” and “prostitute”). What do you think about that?

    • Lazza
      September 21, 2011
      2:53 am

      Stephanie Keil –

      1. I can find you statistical research that proves that 100% of New Yorkers believe in Jesus. All I would have to do was take the study in front of a Church on a Sunday afternoon. Google is NOT the best way to find statistical information at all. How and when and where was the study done? Right?

      2. Sexual abuse is often not reported. Perhaps the women who work in the sex industry are simply more willing to discuss it than women who work as waitresses, bankers, and photographers?

      3. What is your point? Is it that sexually abused women have a higher rate of working in prostitution? Or is it that prostitutes have a higher rate of being abused? Either way, does that say anything about prostitutes, or does it say something about the society that we all live in?

    • Melissa Petro
      September 21, 2011
      7:39 am

      I can’t tell if you’re joking or not. I’m going to assume that you are, because there’s such perfect irony to this statement.

    • Claire
      September 21, 2011
      4:51 pm

      Stephanie,
      your response is exactly why people like Melissa most of the time choose not to stand forward. Do you really think Melissa and the vast majority of women know that most sex workers are abused/have been abused and are in it involuntarily?? THINK. It’s not what she is trying to say – she is simply offering another, very valid perspective.

    • Creatrix Tiara
      September 21, 2011
      7:12 pm

      Most women *in general* would face sexual abuse at some point in their lifetime. Point being?

  • Eva
    September 20, 2011
    6:41 pm

    First, let me say, thanks for writing this post. I enjoyed reading it as I am also a sex worker. I understand how complex these issues are first hand. The only part about the article that threw me off a bit was this line:

    “I was taught that my being heterosexual, not to mention white, was a privilege—but I had never in my life felt privileged. Finally, I thought, I had something about me that made me different, interesting”

    This part seems to indicate that you have not confronted your own privilege- actually you deny it by saying that even though people had told you that you had privilege, you never felt it. Then you follow up with saying that stripping made you interesting as if marginalization is simply a “difference” that makes us interesting and not institutionalized oppression.

    The reason this stood out to me so much (besides that I am a woman of color) is that its crucial to discuss, confront and unpack our privileges within the sex work industry in order to work for justice that includes everybody. By understanding and challenging the dynamics of race and western (while you were working in Mexico as a white woman among women of color)privilege, you would make the discussion more honest which would only benefit the work of social justice for sex workers.

    • Melissa Petro
      September 21, 2011
      7:42 am

      I don’t typically participate in discussions about my work, but I think this is one that there might be something gained by my commenting back. While I’m at it, let me thank Jessica Mack for her work on this piece. I was really happy with the way it turned out, and so honored for the opportunity to be included.

    • Melissa Petro
      September 21, 2011
      8:00 am

      Eva: Thanks for your comment, your kind words and your criticism. The piece was originally near 3,000 words, so much was lost- not to blame the edit but to say that the edit only draws attention to my achille’s heel. The original para read:

      At Antioch, I described my experiences in Mexico as “participant observational research.” On campus, I made no secret I had stripped. Far from keeping it a secret, I wore it like a badge. Before becoming a sex worker, my relative normalcy had been a social liability. On a campus that was sixty percent gay, I had stood out as ‘the straight girl.’ My first year, I was taught that my being heterosexual, not to mention white, was a privilege—but I had never in my life felt privileged. Before I came to Antioch—where it seemed like half the campus was either vegetarian or vegan—I never met anyone who, for reasons political, would refuse food.
      Finally, I thought, I had something about me that made me different, interesting. I had become a sex worker, the very term a political one.

      I am trying to capture the experience of someone who is working class/poor first being introduced to the concept of privilege. I would venture to say that it is a “privilege,” in some respect, just to be so aware. In the community where I grew up, everyone worked, everyone was poor, no one considered themselves “working class.” it was just the way things were. It wasn’t until i went to college did I understand what it meant to be working class. Even then, in classroom discussions, it always felt as if we were talking about someone else. All that is to say that it is difficult to grasp one’s own privilege when one’s own disadvantage is unrecognized. Unable to relate to my own identity as a working class person, sex work/the identity of sex worker filled that place, empowering me in a way that feminism did not.

  • Robyn
    September 20, 2011
    6:46 pm

    This reeks of privilege and worse. Half a million women, boys and girls are abducted a year, and drugged, beaten, raped every day as they are enslaved in the “sex trade.”

    We need to shame and imprison the men who use women and children as disposable commodities. It’s game over. This Happy Hooker tripe gives plausible deniability to rapists. Nice try, tho, Melissa. Keep lying to yourself while real feminists and real HUMANISTS work to have women considered human instead of property.

    • Amelia
      September 20, 2011
      7:04 pm

      Her point isn’t that those atrocities are less horrible, but that no one owns her. Not the people she engaged with as as sex worker, and neither do you and your judgments on her life and experiences.

    • tony
      September 20, 2011
      7:48 pm

      all she did was relate her experience. your right about the women and and children enslavement and im sure she would agree with you on that subject but thats not what shes writing about. chill out already

    • Melissa Petro
      September 21, 2011
      8:23 am

      Robyn: Thanks for the personal email calling me a liar. You get the honored distinction of being the first person to ever reach out to me in my inbox to pronounce your hate– not a close-minded NY Post reader, not some woman-hating conservative, but another self-identified feminist. Some irony to that, wouldn’t you say?

      Please. Google me and read it all. You won’t find anything that discredits my “claims.” You will find plenty, however, that dismantles your mischaracterization that I am a “Happy Hooker.” As others have pointed out, this article is not talking about trafficking; it’s about consensual sex work. It’s the difference between being a slave and working as a domestic. The fact that feminism can’t recognize the distinction is one reason I write, not to brag about how much I loved prostitution (I didn’t).

    • Aspasia
      September 21, 2011
      3:17 pm

      I’m wondering if Robyn could also do us the favor of supplying the statistics of the number of people abused in sweatshops and domestic work the next time a union worker speaks on their experiences in manufacturing or a former teenage babysitter talks about her or his experience looking after pre-schoolers on weekends and after school. I mean, it’s all the same work, right?

      • Joanna
        September 21, 2011
        5:08 pm

        Feminism is DEAD. Simple and clear. It’s not for sistas at all, it’s for bored intellectuals needing a mind wank. http://twitter.com/#!/Aantifeminism

  • Max Haley
    September 21, 2011
    3:49 pm

    This was thoughtful and an important. I am most taken with this phrase: “in conversations about sex work, I spoke in the third person”. Isn’t that true of the entire world of sex work? Providers, clients/customers, advertisers, etc. etc. The conversation will likely never progress in our culture unless more folks are willing to take it “first person.”

  • Miriam
    September 25, 2011
    3:05 am

    Although I have never worked in the sex trade, I realize it is a job like any other. By opening up sex work to discussion it allows a better understanding of the problems, risks, and benefits of those jobs. It also allows people the chance to help minimize the dangers for those who work in that job.

    The saddest thing about the people that demonize sex workers while claiming to be Feminists is that they make it more difficult to fight for better working conditions and respect.

Latest Global Gender Justice News

  • New Project! We need your help!

    New Project! We need your help!

  • Start Improving the World: Goodbye, Gender Across Borders

    Start Improving the World: Goodbye, Gender Across Borders

  • Global Feminist Link Love: April 21 – 27

    Global Feminist Link Love: April 21 – 27

  • Male, female, hetero, homo: does the binarism really exist or are we making it up?

    Male, female, hetero, homo: does the binarism really exist or are we making it up?

  • Essentialism, constructionism, and why I like plaid

    Essentialism, constructionism, and why I like plaid

  • Understanding my sexuality through queer theory

    Understanding my sexuality through queer theory

  • Dangers of identity politics: does science hold all the answers?

    Dangers of identity politics: does science hold all the answers?

  • Profile of a “Gaysian”

    Profile of a “Gaysian”

  • “Yes I am too, but am I really?” On queerness and socialization.

    “Yes I am too, but am I really?” On queerness and socialization.

  • Welcome to the series “Born this way? The role of the nature vs nurture debate in sexual identity formation and acceptance”!

    Welcome to the series “Born this way? The role of the nature vs nurture debate in sexual identity formation and acceptance”!

  • Unpacking my daddy issues

    Unpacking my daddy issues

  • Women’s Solidarity: Speaking With One Voice for Equality

    Women’s Solidarity: Speaking With One Voice for Equality

  • Report Addresses Gender Gap in London

    Report Addresses Gender Gap in London

  • Integration, Honor and Women in Germany

    Integration, Honor and Women in Germany

  • A Question of Royalty: How Black Princesses are Faring on the International Stage

    A Question of Royalty: How Black Princesses are Faring on the International Stage

  • Global Feminist Link Love: April 14-20

    Global Feminist Link Love: April 14-20

  • Women in the Middle

    Women in the Middle

  • Malawi: New President and New Media

    Malawi: New President and New Media

  • Illusions of Abandonment: Euro-orphans in Poland’s Immigrant Families

    Illusions of Abandonment: Euro-orphans in Poland’s Immigrant Families

  • Chasing Elusive Dreams: The Quandary of Zimbabwean Women

    Chasing Elusive Dreams: The Quandary of Zimbabwean Women

← previous next →
Gender Across Borders
  • Mission
  • Contact Us
  • Comments Policy
    search:
    © Copyright 2013 — Gender Across Borders. All Rights Reserved Designed by WPZOOM