Saudi Women Drive, But Is the UN On Board?
The Arab Spring may have largely sprung, but for women in Saudi Arabia, it’s still blooming. Since the announcement this April that Saudi women will, once again, not be allowed to vote in September’s countrywide elections, coalitions of women activists have been mobilizing.
Women in Saudi Arabia have long withstood extraordinary oppression – including male guardianship laws, prohibition of driving, and the lack of educational, economic, and political access – which they are working to dismantle. Earlier this Spring, social networking platforms served as a launch pad for the Saudi Women Revolution, which laid out a number of requests for increased freedom and rights – the right to drive among them.
In June, the Women2Drive campaign, a concerted effort of Saudi women bloggers and activists and also deeply rooted in social media, was launched to overturn the driving ban. As if the full list of rights demanded by the Saudi Women Revolution back in April was too overwhelming for the world to comprehend, it seems that narrowing the campaign to focus on driving as an entry point has proved a powerful advocacy tool which as quickly garnered global media attention and support.
Saudi women advocates organized a “drive-in” on June 17, encouraging Saudi women holding international driver’s licenses to drive their cars across the country and record videos of themselves doing so. The collection of brief and shaky videos of women simply driving, unremarkable in any other context, are both moving and inspirational to watch.
Up until now, the Women2Drive campaign had subsisted largely on grassroots social media support. Then the group smartly put the screws to some of the world’s top diplomats and women’s rights crusaders, calling publicly on US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Lady Catherine Ashton, the EU’s High Representative of Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, to offer up resounding support.
On June 21, Secretary Clinton gave the following statement of support:
“What these women are doing is brave and what they are seeking is right. […] I am moved by it, and I support them. […] But I want to, again, underscore and emphasize that this is not about the United States. It’s not about what any of us on the outside say. It is about the women themselves and their right to raise their concerns with their own government.”
Her nuance is understandable, given the US and Saudi Arabia’s close and complex political ties, yet perhaps not all that defensible. Secretary Clinton has never been one to restrict her beliefs about women’s rights to US boundaries, and therein lies her integrity as a global rights advocate. Last year, she bluntly chided Canadian Prime Minister Harper for thinking he could omit safe abortion and contraception from the G8 maternal health funding scheme. Driving is an infinitely more mundane issue than abortion or contraception, yet the US is not (yet) mired in oil relations with Canada as we are with Saudi Arabia.
Lady Ashton likewise released a subdued statement of support calling Saudi women advocates “courageous” for their efforts. However measured their responses, the symbolic significance of Clinton and Ashton’s public support for the campaign is great. Yet it is clear that no further political muscle will be devoted to this cause at the time, and perhaps Saudi women advocates should consider looking elsewhere.
What about UN Women, the new superagency launched in 2010 to steward global women’s rights? Where is their public declaration of support and guidance on a successful advocacy strategy moving forward? In April, I suggested that that UN Women had a unique obligation to support the Saudi women’s rights movement after electing the country to its elite advisory board amidst international outcry. Unlike the US, which must navigate a complexity of political ties to Saudi Arabia, the UN isn’t bound by bilateral biases. Rather, with Saudi Arabia sitting on both the UN Human Rights Council and UN Women boards, there is opportunity for leverage.
Since its inception in September 2010, UN Women has enjoyed a jubilant coming out year. With the impressive Michelle Bachelet at the helm, and the weight of several women-focused UN campaigns behind it, UN Women has seen global media coverage, support, and excitement for its efforts grow. It’s truly wonderful. And earlier this month they launched their flagship report, “Progress of the World’s Women”, an impressive summation of progress and shortcomings in global women’s rights.
The new report includes pointed policy recommendations for improving women’s rights worldwide, such as the institution of gender quotas, an increased number of women in law enforcement, and additional support for women’s legal organizations. The report has garnered well-deserved enthusiasm from the global development community, and it is a good sign that the superagency is both serious about its mission, and has the influence and deftness to achieve it.
Yet the report does not include any particular mention of the status of women in Saudi Arabia, or the serious regulations that burden their daily lives. UN Women’s own new-found global support comes at an opportune time as they can now turn the focus onto women’s rights movement currently in-progress, such as in Saudi Arabia. UN Women should help leverage the awareness raised through the Saudi Women Revolution and Women2Drive social media campaigns, working with Saudi women and political leaders to consider concrete next steps on the policy and practical levels. The car is warmed and ready, and Saudi women are behind the wheel; is the UN coming along?
Like Gender Across Borders on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter and Tumblr. Subscribe to our monthly newsletter. UPDATE: to take part in our survey regarding international feminism, click here.



7:41 pm
I think it would be more accurate to state that the UN *shouldn’t* be bound by bilateral biases, but unfortunately all the bilateral biases come into play when we’re talking about the UN.
I totally agree that the agency should take a stand with Saudi women, absolutely. But let’s be realistic about what the agency can do, when the stated enthusiasm about its launching has not been matched by any real support in funding or other practical ways.
In fact, of the initial (conservative) $500 mil initial budget, less than $100 mil has been committed yet by the member states. We’re talking about a UN agency that’s supposed to serve the needs of half the world’s population. One hundred million is just a little higher than the *daily* US military support to Israel, and I don’t know how many times lower than the US overall *daily* military spending. I could go on forever with stats like this; they do make the point – priorities are clear, I think, and not just for the US.
The lack of support for UNW has prompted Stephen Lewis, a former Canadian ambassador to the UN, to state that the new agency is being “strangled at birth” (http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=56313). I think it would be more productive if we pointed the fingers at the member states and demanded they put their money where their promises are (as part of this post does, too). At this point, criticising the new agency feels to me more like flogging a horse that is not even able to stand yet.
9:36 pm
Manuela,
Thanks for your thoughts. Definitely no flogging here — I think UN Women is an important agency that is already doing good work with much more promise ahead, and I and many other women’s rights advocates are really excited by that. I think I make that very clear. You’re right that the member states should take a stand – but given the newness, I think the impetus should be mutual at this point. I agree that there are many issues/problems/policies to address with limited budget/time, but what organization or agency doesn’t have that same conundrum? I think one of the most important things in advocacy is taking advantage of opportunities as they arise. The fact that Saudi women have been and continue to mobilize right now is a clear opportunity for greater global support.