The Misappropriation of Breastfeeding and the Shaming of Girls
Over a month ago, I was checking my twitter-feed when I came across a headline from a well-respected blog that I frequently visit. You can believe me when I say that I wasn’t browsing for a little something to buy my niece or nephew when I clicked the link to “11 Insanely Sexualized Children’s Products”. In all honestly, I didn’t need to see these inevitably absurd products, but a part of me knew that they would be so absurd, that the whole list would be somewhat of a sad joke.
To an extent it was. Weird hot-pink baby slippers with spike heels? Check. A pole dancing doll? Yup, that too. An orange-haired gremlin-looking doll that you can shave? Oh yes, that was true comic genius. But then I happened upon something that at first made me feel a little funny, and then made me feel plain angry.
It was a breast-feeding doll.
I sat perplexed for a minute while I gathered my thoughts. Let’s not be hasty, I thought. What does the author say?
Baby dolls do all kinds of gross stuff like pee and barf, but the all-too-realistic breastfeeding baby takes the cake. Not because of the doll’s own sucking action, but because the doll comes with a halter the child wears, allowing the doll to latch onto little flowers where nipples would be. Huh? Oh, and the sound effects featured on the box—‘chup, chup’—yikes.
Before any lactivists get up in arms, I’m not calling breastfeeding gross. I’m calling 9-year-olds simulating breastfeeding gross. Also, the word ‘lactivist’ is hilarious.
When my eyes first raced over the bit about lactivists getting up in arms I thought, oh good, at least he understands the implications of his statement. But then I realized, wait a second, this is patronizing. The author uses the word lactivists as if it represents some kind of reactionary, overly sensitive group and then he down-right insults the word altogether. Even though the author admits to not believing that breastfeeding is gross, he insists that nine year olds simulating breastfeeding is gross. But I beg to ask, why? What is this discomfort that lingers around the edges of breastfeeding?
Breastfeeding is by far one of the most normal and one of the most phenomenal biological attributes of the human body. In my humble opinion, breastfeeding is a natural wonder.
Let’s begin at the basics. Breastfeeding is fantastic for women for several reasons. According to the World Health Organization, immediate breastfeeding signals the body to slow contractions, reducing the risk of post-labor hemorrhaging and later on, nursing signals the body to readjust to pre-pregnancy weight, which often results in significant weight-loss and a lower risk of obesity. Likewise, when done exclusively, breastfeeding slows menstruation, which acts as a very basic form of birth control. This is a particularly important aspect of breastfeeding for women who do not have access to other forms of birth control and who do not have the means or the interest in serial reproduction. Breastfeeding also lowers the risk of developing both ovarian cancer and breast cancer. Finally, breast-feeding is 100% cost effective because it’s free. And that’s just the beginning.
Breastfeeding is also stellar for babies because breast milk is the best possible nourishment for newborns, infants and young ones. It provides babies with loads of beneficial nutrients and it contains antibodies that keep babies happy and healthy, free from illnesses such as pneumonia and diarrhea. There have also been studies which indicate that the benefits of breast milk extend well into adulthood and regularly result in lower cholesterol, lower blood pressure, and lower likelihoods of being overweight, obese or contracting type-2 diabetes. Some studies even conclude that breastfed babies make smarter adults.
Then there is this little thing called oxytocin. Oxytocin is the human hormone responsible for labor contractions and the process of “letting down”, which is the flow of breast milk upon latching. More recently, there have been studies that claim that oxytocin is something like a “love hormone”, often acting as the agent which creates the sacred maternal-infant bond during breastfeeding. In many ways, breastfeeding is not just an act of survival and physical benefit; it helps create an important, mutual relationship between mother and child.
So while breastfeeding has enormous benefits for the mother and her baby on a micro level, perhaps nothing speaks more to the positivity of breastfeeding than the fact that is has the capacity to save lives. As the World Health Organization writes:
Malnutrition is responsible for one-third of the 8.8 million deaths annually among children under five. It can be a direct cause of death but is also the most important single risk factor for disease in young children. Over two thirds of these deaths, which are often associated with inappropriate feeding practices such as bottle-feeding or untimely and inadequate complementary foods, occur during the first months of life.
And how may exclusive breastfeeding change this devastating global statistic and unfortunate truth? According to Dr Elizabeth Mason, Director of WHO’s Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Development:
If all babies and young children were breastfed exclusively for their first six months of life and then given nutritious complementary food with continued breastfeeding up to two years of age, the lives of an additional 1.5 million children under five would be saved every year.
I will repeat this fact. Due in large part to breastfeeding, 1.5 million children under the age of five could be saved Every Year. That’s 7.5 million lives saved in five years. That is more than the entire population of Tajikistan. That is close to two million more people than the total populations of Utah, Montana, Wyoming and Idaho combined. Superbreast to the rescue indeed.
Now, I don’t want to undermine the effort it takes to breastfeed. Breastfeeding occurs at regular, sometimes inconvenient intervals throughout the day, and it’s no surprise that women often have to deal with chapped, sore or sensitive nipples, especially when their babies start to teethe. For many women, there is also the considerable question of how to prevent the transmission of HIV to infants during birth and breastfeeding. Breastfeeding takes patience, correct information, unwavering social support, and perseverance. It is for this reason that organizations such as La Leche League International create support groups all over the world to help encourage women to breastfeed, even when it is emotionally, socio-culturally, communally and physically taxing.
Still, women all around the world accept breastfeeding as the best option for themselves and their babies. Women in Burkina Faso breastfeed without shame. Women in Jordan breastfeed without batting an eyelash. In Argentina, where I studied abroad and worked within a public health center, the midwife gave important talks on the severe importance of breastfeeding. A seventeen year old that I spoke with one day, unabashedly breastfed her four month old while conversing with me. My last day at the center, the midwife gave me a picture of her during a moment when her son, who was nursing, “popped off” leaving her breast exposed. On the back she wrote a heartfelt and sentimental good-bye note. This token exemplifies how normal breastfeeding is in the country. You can give someone a picture of yourself breastfeeding without feeling like there is something inappropriate about the exchange.
While breastfeeding is widely accepted and encouraged across the globe, in my experience it appears that breasts in the US are so overly sexualized within popular spheres, that it creates this extreme discomfort surrounding the non-sexual act of breastfeeding. Kim Kardashian (ever the role model) thinks public breastfeeding is disgusting. Facebook flagged and removed photos of mothers breastfeeding because it was considered obscene. And there was public outrage when supermodel Miranda Kerr chose an image of herself breastfeeding to be the public’s first glimpse of her new addition.
However the picture I was given, pictures posted online, and public breastfeeding are not disgusting, obscene, gross or shameful because aside from the fact that breastfeeding is obviously amazing, it is not sexual in the least. This is exactly what the blogger in question was explicitly NOT suggesting. The author is claiming the opposite, that a breastfeeding doll is sexual, which still makes no sense to me.
In large part, I’ve included so much information on breastfeeding in this post because I expect and hope that the more anyone knows and understands about the act, the more they realize that it is an incredibly natural, loving, and exceptionally healthy part of being a mother and an infant. Once a person grasps all the amazing benefits of nursing, it becomes close to impossible to justify any benefits of not breastfeeding. Yet, the problem lies in that even if a person recognizes the importance of breastfeeding, there is still some issue surrounding the act as a public display. Somehow, the involvement of a breast indicates that breastfeeding is sexy and intimate and needs to be done in private. In actuality, while certain aspects of breastfeeding are intimate and personal (such as whatever emotional experience is shared between a mother and her child) it is in no way intimate in the way that a lover kissing your breasts is intimate. Why? Because obviously, these serve two entirely different purposes. The context is utterly different.
A lot of us from the time we are young witness the breast at its supposed sexiest. We watch them be highlighted and adorned in lingerie commercials, on fashion runways, in movies and music videos basically to the point of perversion: we watch in disgust, rapture and intrigue as plastic surgeons on television explicitly demonstrate the cutting and jabbing and stuffing of an implant into a woman’s chest. We can withstand this, but we cannot fathom why a woman would want to take pride in nourishing her child.
I sense that due to the prevalence of these images, it becomes difficult to remember the primary evolutionary and physical purpose of the female breasts: to develop nutrient rich milk to feed our young. Every mammal has this ability and we are no different. Breasts may be sexy too, but they exist for a very distinct and specific biological, maternal, unparalleled process that should never be undermined, ignored or disregarded simply because they can double as sexually attractive and arousing. When you think that a woman breastfeeding is gross, think about why it is important for her to breastfeed, and think again about why her breast contains milk to begin with. It’s certainly not so she can become Playboy’s playmate of the month.
Finally, getting back to the question at hand, why is it gross for a nine year old to simulate breastfeeding? Well I do not, even for a millisecond, think it is. Primarily, my reasoning stems from the fact that breastfeeding is not sexual. It’s not a secret that girls are bombarded with ways to emulate being sexy, from wearing “juicy” across the seat of their pants to dancing provocatively to not-so-empowering music, but believe me, breastfeeding isn’t one of those things. Secondly, it’s insanely tough to find a place where comprehensive sexual education including the process of anatomical maturation is taught. Thus, there is this enormous and grave conflict preventing us from helping girls understand the functions, wonders and beauty of their bodies before some kind of unhealthy medium intervenes. And it’s not just the media or culture, 15% of children who experience sexual abuse in the U.S. are under the age of 12; 29% are between the ages of 12-17 and this brand of violence frequently leads to various physical and emotional issues regarding an individual’s relationship to their body.
So when an impressionable girl decides to explore her body without discomfort, fear or pain—without shame or embarrassment, and she positively realizes that one day she will have the incredible capacity to feed her children from what will become her breasts, and she decides to imitate this behavior I don’t blanch at the thought. I don’t turn my head and roll my eyes in disgust because she is healthily, confidently engaging her body. No, what I say is, good for you. You go and you explore and you figure things out for yourself. You be proud of who you are and what your body can do. There is undoubtedly enough happening around you claiming that you need to be this or look like that, but you figure out how you want to represent and believe in your body. It’s your own and no part of it is gross; it is awesomely, superbly, naturally amazing.
Like Gender Across Borders on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter and Tumblr. Subscribe to our monthly newsletter. UPDATE: to take part in our survey regarding international feminism, click here.







8:10 am
I guess my problem with this breastfeeding doll doesn’t lie in whether or not it is sexy, but more in the fact that a child is already being taught that this is right, this is what the girl should want to do when she grows up.
There is nothing wrong with breastfeeding, but I don’t think it’s right to give a little girl a clear idea that there is only one way how to be a good woman – to have a child and then to breastfeed it.
What happens to all those girls who grow up to be women not interested in children? I know they exist, because I am one of them and I have several friends with similar convictions. What happens to the grown woman’s self esteem when it turns out she can’t breastfeed for one reason or another? She’s been told since childhood that this is the correct way to be a woman, and now there’s something wrong with her.
I frankly think that if a girl wants this doll, by all means, give it to her if you can afford it. But don’t do it unless she asks, because children should have as much freedom to realize their own sexuality and sexual identity(sexuality does not necessarily mean that it’s something erotic), dolls and toys shouldn’t determine their opinions on what is right.
9:42 am
By this logic, are you offended by the plethora of dolls with bottles?!
9:58 am
With extremely low breastfeeding rates (as compared to the rest of the world) in the US and UK, where this doll is being marketed, I’m not sure it’s a huge worry that it will have that drastic of an impact on these girls as far as making them think that breastfeeding is *the* only way. Not at all.
It’s actually quite refreshing to find a doll that doesn’t automatically come with a plastic bottle. What would be ideal, in my opinion, would be to sell dolls with neither accessory and allow the children to decide what to do with their own creativity and imagination.
While I understand your concerns re:breastfeeding as it relates to being a “good woman”, I think we also have to remember that those lactivists that promote breastfeeding are more concerned with the actual breastmilk being given to babies, not necessarily the method. For instance, many women choose to pump and bottle feed or use donor milk. Look at the case of Elton John and his partner who feed their newborn son breastmilk from a donor. I do get how many people tie in breastfeeding to “womanhood” but (in my mind) it’s more complex then that.
Either way – I think just the fact that this doll exists is a good start, and see nothing sexualizing or erotic about it. Despite my lactivist ideals, I would probably not buy it for my son or for my daughter(if I had one) just as I wouldn’t buy a doll with a bottle. Just a plain old doll will suffice
10:30 am
Exactly. Many children (boys and girls) who have been around breastfeeding will often “nurse” their baby dolls without complicated gizmos. But I see nothing wrong with anything that normalizes breastfeeding in a culture where that lived experience of witnessing breastfeeding is often missing, not to mention in a culture that works to systematically pathologize breastfeeding.
9:46 am
Great post.
The “controversy” surrounding breastfeeding in the United States is on my list of “top ten reasons why the United States as a nation is essentially a toddler.” Breastfeeding is a non-issue, a no-brainer, for most of the world. It’s only because our country wants its citizens to be consumers above all else that it has become stigmatized. Thanks for doing your part to normalize breastfeeding.
10:02 am
Breastfeeding is not sexual. A breastfeeding doll is a great opportunity to teach about what a female body is designed to do and that is to birth and feed babies. Granted, not all of our bodies work that way and not all women choose to breastfeed but that doesn’t imply that we can’t teach our children how the female body is designed! It is no different than having a baby that eats faux baby food or takes a bottle. It is simply another form of nutrition that just happens to come from the babies mother. How can that be so wrong? A girl should know that there are lots of ways to feed a baby and breastfeeding is one of them. A doll that simulates eating is a doll that simulates eating. What does it matter where the food comes from? What a beautiful way to teach a little girl that there are different ways to feed a baby and not only the ways that Toys r Us promotes! This is especially great when mom is introducing a new baby to the home. Robina…you are right. This should be a non-issue!
10:20 am
What a great, thoughtful piece! Thank you! Breastfeeding is normal. It’s sad that we have lost touch with that very simple fact.
3:10 pm
I can see both sides of the argument. On one hand, breast-feeding dolls could help de-sexualize breasts and show what they are “really” for – providing nutrition to babies. But there is also the issue that this could influence young girls to become pregnant when they’re still very young.
3:56 pm
As in a comment above, Rachel, do you then think that dolls with bottles, or ANY babydoll, for that matter, will influence girls to become pregnant at an early age? What is it about breastfeeding play that, to you, makes young girls more likely to be promiscuous? How does the act of feeding a baby the way nature intended promote early sexual activity, when feeding artificially does not? Or does all pretend mothering play influence girls’ sexual appetites?
3:19 pm
Very well said!
4:09 pm
Wonderfully written article! My children, BOTH boys and girls, have all engaged in breastfeeding play, even without this doll. I see nothing wrong with this doll. Nothing at all. But, in my house, it’s not necessary, because my kids have figured out how to breastfeed their babydolls (and Beanie Babies and Webkinz… LOL) without and props or sucking noises. But this is probably because they have witnessed me and my sister nursing our babies without covering and without shame.
I take it one step further… Since I have a large family (7 kids, so far), my oldest boy is now a teenager. And, while nursing, I no longer worry about covering up in front of him. I want him to understand that, first and foremost, breasts are for FEEDING. Yeah, they are fun, but that is a perk, not the primary reason for their existence. My hope is that if we raise our boys (and girls) to view the breast not as a sexual fetish, but as a nurturing place, breastfeeding will become the norm, and no one will blink or think twice when they see a mother nursing her child (or even her toddler) in public. Which is as it should be.
Once again, I commend you on your wonderful thoughts.
7:15 pm
I take issue with only one thing, Tahira. Breastfeeding doesn’t make babies smarter. We evolved to breastfeed. When we choose formula we actually do potential damage to our infants’ intellectual capacity. Similarly, breastfeeding doesn’t save babies’ lives. Feeding babies’ formula increases infant mortality. Women without ready access to clean water compromise the health of their infants when they choose formula. Similarly, babies born in developing countries who receive formula are at risk of malnutrition because mothers often skimp on the powder to save money. I don’t want to seem to blame women because in fact outside of the US formula makers still make unethical pitches related to modesty, nutrition, being able to measure how much a baby is eating and so on to convince women who would otherwise breastfeed to use formula instead.
We evolved to breastfeed. When we talk about the benefits of breastfeeding we need to be careful that we don’t use formula as the benchmark for normal. When we flip the logic of the discussion, feeding an infant formula seems risky and becomes unappealing.
1:31 am
Actually breastfeeding has been shown to be associated with higher IQ
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20890478
“Evidence from a large cluster randomised trial shows breastfeeding is associated with higher intelligence quotient at 6 years of age”
10:38 pm
Wonderfully written! Aside from the politics and health and bonding benefits of breastfeeding a child, often overlooked is the health benefit to the mother who breastfeeds. Breastfeeding can have positive long term health outcomes for the mother too, not just the child, as was mentioned.
If there is a doll that promotes breastfeeding, then great! Breasfeeding is not shameful and kids should learn that it is the way we evolved to feed our babies! However, it’s probably not a toy I would buy for my kids but I would never buy a doll with a bottle! I agree with Karen that in a child’s active imagination, it’s completely reasonable for a child- yes, even a boy!- to pretend to breastfeed any stuffed animal or doll they are playing with, regardless of the child’s gender or the species of the doll/stuffed animal. My boys are as fond of breastfeeding their stuffed lemurs as often as their dolls!
8:54 am
I forgot to tell you I loved your post. Your topic is important, and you’re a splendid writer. I can’t wait for the follow-up.
5:22 pm
Tahira, all your writing is great and this piece is absolutely spot on. Also want to second @Ariane Ben Eli that the rhetorical framing of these issues is extremely important and powerful.