• About
    • Mission
    • The GAB Team
      • Emily Heroy
      • Colleen Hodgetts
      • Kyle Bachan
      • Laura Beaulne-Stuebing
      • Tanya Castle
      • Avory Faucette
      • Atifa Hasham
      • Chally Kacelnik
      • Ashley Lauren
      • Amy Littlefield
      • Avital Nathman
      • Carrie Nelson
      • Nadia Smiecinska
      • Spectra Speaks
      • Henrike Dessaules
      • Fatma El-Nahry
      • Charlotte Jalvingh
      • Jessica Megarry
      • Imen Yacoubi
      • Leticia Zenevich
      • Contributing Writers
    • Newsletter
    • Copyright
    • Comments
    • Contact
  • Feminist Resources
    • Global Feminist Link Love
    • Series
    • Blogroll
  • Call for Writers
Gender Across Borders
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Activism
  • Health
  • Education
  • Film & TV
  • Literature
  • Music
  • Queer Issues
  • Race/Ethnicity
ARE YOU NEW TO GENDER ACROSS BORDERS? Then please read this first. Thanks for stopping by!

Is women’s ‘double-shift’ a myth?

October 5, 2010 10:00 am 4 comments

Share this Article

  • TwitterTwitter
  • FacebookFacebook
  • DeliciousDelicious
  • DiggDigg
  • StumbleuponStumble
  • RedditReddit

Author:

Amelia

Tags:

Family gender workplace flexibility

Image via momadvice.com

Like many couples, my partner and I argue about housework on a regular basis. But according to new research, my perceived ‘double-shift’ of work and housework is a myth. Catherine Hakim, a sociologist at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), argues that:

We now have a much more specific and accurate portrait of how families and individuals divide their ‘work’ and this data overturns the well-entrenched theory that women work disproportional long hours in jobs and at home in juggling family and work. Feminists constantly complain that men are not doing their fair share of domestic work. The reality is that most men already do more than their fair share.

These findings are based on the results of time use surveys, which ask people to record what they do with their time. The results show that once the number of hours people spend doing paid jobs and unpaid household work are added together, women and men do roughly equal amounts of work – about eight hours a day. Men do more hours of paid work, while women divide their time more evenly between paid and unpaid work. Only when both partners have full-time jobs and no children at home, do women work more hours than men.

While men and women may put in similar hours overall, it’s not clear that men are doing their fair share of work around the house. Instead, the results suggest that when couples start families, men spend more time working outside the home and women scale back on paid work to make time for housework and childcare. According to the results of the UK 2000 Time Use Survey, on average, men spend one hour and 17 minutes longer than women on paid employment per day, while women spend over an hour and a half longer than men on housework.

Perhaps women’s perceived ‘double-shift’ reflects the challenges of juggling work and family life, regardless of the actual hours involved. In other words, four hours of work followed by four hours of kids, laundry and vacuuming can sometimes be more physically and emotionally demanding than an eight-hour day at the office. Does focusing on how many hours men and women spend ‘working’ tell the whole story?

Hakim argues that how work is divided comes down to lifestyle preference, not gender. People are either work-centered, home-centered, or want to combine work and family (adaptive). According to her research, most women are adaptive, while most men are work-centered. But, she points out, more men are demanding work-life balance and family-friendly employment benefits. This is good news for the future, given the aging and demographic change ahead. Employers around the world will soon be facing serious labour shortages and looking for ways to best attract and retain talented employees. Building a flexible workplace that offers employees choices about which hours they work, how many hours they work, and where they work is one way to address this challenge. It also gives both men and women options to balance the needs of work and home, and to ensure that both partners are doing their fair share – in and outside of the home.

Are you new to Gender Across Borders? Please read this first. We may update the site, and you can stay in contact with us through our Twitter feed and our newsletter. Like Gender Across Borders on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter and Tumblr. Subscribe to our monthly newsletter.

4 Comments

  • Laura Simko
    October 5, 2010
    2:32 pm

    I find it interesting that the study is UK based. Can the findings necessarily be applied to North Americans? From my experience in New England and Nova Scotia, I think not, but perhaps it is also age related more than continent specific.

    • Watching
      October 6, 2010
      7:49 am

      I don’t know why anyone continues to feed Hakim’s ego. The problem is that this researcher, frankly, has very little credibility. Not even with academics who don’t consider themselves feminists. But gender theorists look at her methodology and the conclusions she draws, and shake their heads. If she’s going to have a contrarian view, she should at least be rigorous in her research. Dig deep into it and ask questions. Then look at her “new” theories on “erotic capital” and draw your own conclusions (I’ll give you a hint: it’s ridiculously simplistic and anachronistic). There’s a good reason why she’s rarely (if ever?) asked to lecture at LSE.

  • Amelia DeMarco
    October 5, 2010
    5:55 pm

    In the report, the author claims that results for Britain are repeated in the US and other countries, even when differences in lifestyles and the length of working weeks are taken into account. While the paper doesn’t back these claims up with numbers, the results of the American time use survey are available online. In 2009, employed men worked 56 minutes more than employed women (among full-time workers, men worked 8.3 hours compared with 7.5 hours for women). On days that they did housework, women spent an average of 2.6 hours, while men spent 2.0 hours. Women also spent more time on childcare than men. When you add it all together, women and men spend an approximately equal number of hours “working”, but men spend more time doing paid work and women spend more time doing unpaid work.

    I think this reflects my own relationship, since we both put in similar hours overall, but I spend a little more time on housework and my partner spends a little more time on work related to his career. I’d like to see men and women contributing equally to work inside and outside of the home, not just work overall.

  • Nadia
    October 6, 2010
    6:45 pm

    This research strikes me as something that misses the obvious, isn’t saying that women are more “adaptive” and men more “work-centered” a clear reflection of what society’s expectations are for each gender? So it is not so much that women objectively choose to be “adaptive” but that societal pressure on a mother,and not always very friendly family policies in the work place, force women into this situation. Same goes for men who are expected to be “providers” and even if they want more family time, may feel like the pressure to bring home the bacon is just too strong to challenge. It is wonderful that men (and women I know)are fighting for more family-work balance, but on the whole the expectation that a woman should be more involved in her family (at the expense of her paid job) than her male partner is still alive and well. As one other commenter mentioned, it is important for each of us to fight for that balance so that both men and women, who are partnered or married, take the time to feel fulfilled in their paid careers as well as in the home with their loved ones.

Latest Global Gender Justice News

  • Start Improving the World: Goodbye, Gender Across Borders

    Start Improving the World: Goodbye, Gender Across Borders

  • Global Feminist Link Love: April 21 – 27

    Global Feminist Link Love: April 21 – 27

  • Male, female, hetero, homo: does the binarism really exist or are we making it up?

    Male, female, hetero, homo: does the binarism really exist or are we making it up?

  • Essentialism, constructionism, and why I like plaid

    Essentialism, constructionism, and why I like plaid

  • Understanding my sexuality through queer theory

    Understanding my sexuality through queer theory

  • Dangers of identity politics: does science hold all the answers?

    Dangers of identity politics: does science hold all the answers?

  • Profile of a “Gaysian”

    Profile of a “Gaysian”

  • “Yes I am too, but am I really?” On queerness and socialization.

    “Yes I am too, but am I really?” On queerness and socialization.

  • Welcome to the series “Born this way? The role of the nature vs nurture debate in sexual identity formation and acceptance”!

    Welcome to the series “Born this way? The role of the nature vs nurture debate in sexual identity formation and acceptance”!

  • Unpacking my daddy issues

    Unpacking my daddy issues

  • Women’s Solidarity: Speaking With One Voice for Equality

    Women’s Solidarity: Speaking With One Voice for Equality

  • Report Addresses Gender Gap in London

    Report Addresses Gender Gap in London

  • Integration, Honor and Women in Germany

    Integration, Honor and Women in Germany

  • A Question of Royalty: How Black Princesses are Faring on the International Stage

    A Question of Royalty: How Black Princesses are Faring on the International Stage

  • Global Feminist Link Love: April 14-20

    Global Feminist Link Love: April 14-20

  • Women in the Middle

    Women in the Middle

  • Malawi: New President and New Media

    Malawi: New President and New Media

  • Illusions of Abandonment: Euro-orphans in Poland’s Immigrant Families

    Illusions of Abandonment: Euro-orphans in Poland’s Immigrant Families

  • Chasing Elusive Dreams: The Quandary of Zimbabwean Women

    Chasing Elusive Dreams: The Quandary of Zimbabwean Women

  • “In South East Asia, progress is being made on the backs of poor women”

    “In South East Asia, progress is being made on the backs of poor women”

← previous next →
Gender Across Borders
  • Mission
  • Contact Us
  • Comments Policy
    search:
    © Copyright 2012 — Gender Across Borders. All Rights Reserved Designed by WPZOOM