• Survey
  • About
    • Mission
    • The GAB Team
      • Emily Heroy
      • Colleen Hodgetts
      • Kyle Bachan
      • Laura Beaulne-Stuebing
      • Tanya Castle
      • Avory Faucette
      • Atifa Hasham
      • Chally Kacelnik
      • Ashley Lauren
      • Amy Littlefield
      • Avital Nathman
      • Carrie Nelson
      • Nadia Smiecinska
      • Spectra Speaks
      • Henrike Dessaules
      • Fatma El-Nahry
      • Charlotte Jalvingh
      • Jessica Megarry
      • Imen Yacoubi
      • Leticia Zenevich
      • Contributing Writers
    • Newsletter
    • Copyright
    • Comments
    • Contact
  • Feminist Resources
    • Global Feminist Link Love
    • Series
    • Blogroll
Gender Across Borders
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Activism
  • Health
  • Education
  • Film & TV
  • Literature
  • Music
  • Queer Issues
  • Race/Ethnicity
It's survey time! We're working on an exciting new project here at GAB, and you can help! Click here for more information.

Visuality and Feminism(?) in Lady Gaga’s “Telephone” Video

April 16, 2010 10:00 am 7 comments

Share this Article

  • TwitterTwitter
  • FacebookFacebook
  • DeliciousDelicious
  • DiggDigg
  • StumbleuponStumble
  • RedditReddit

Author:

Amy Littlefield

Tags:

feminism Lady Gaga pop culture transphobia women


It’s unclear whether or not the Lady Gaga’s music video for “Telephone” is a feminist triumph, but one thing is for sure: feminists are watching it — and talking about it — a lot.

The video pushes visual and political boundaries. It’s filled with evocative images — Wonder Woman costumes, flat, white abs, mayonnaise and other sandwich-making materials, a headpiece made from telephones, and the main event: Lady Gaga’s vulva.

The video creates a whole new genre of music video — a ten-minute long visual landscape packed with images of sexuality and consumer culture, based only loosely on the content of the song.

Feminist critics (and supporters) are blogging about the video’s treatment of race  (Why does Beyoncé act as a sidekick, not the main event? And why does the Asian woman in the video “think” in Japanese?) and representations of gender and sexualities (What is the gender identity of the person Gaga makes out with in the prison yard? And what is Lady Gaga trying to accomplish by flashing her vulva?) not to mention the video’s depiction of prison (Um, doesn’t it sort of glorify sexual aggression in prisons, and why aren’t any of the prisoners who are people of color allowed to dance with Gaga?). Such discussions (and other commentaries that deconstruct symbols in the video) are far more fruitful and interesting than the video itself. Why?

Because this is a pop video. And with pop videos, visuality comes first. For Gaga, the newly-throned goddess of the pop world, the visual attraction of an image comes before the meaning of the image, as she told Ryan Seacrest in a recent radio interview about the video:

“I also really believe in the power of visuals. And sometimes I just kind of see things, and visions come to me, and I just know I have to do them. It kind of doesn’t really matter what it is if it makes sense or if it doesn’t make sense…”

And the video kind of doesn’t make sense. Gaga gets bailed out of jail by Beyoncé, then the pair (accidentally?) poison a diner full of people in an attempt to kill off Beyoncé’s sucky boyfriend (Tyrese Gibson). They make a Thelma and Louise-esque getaway in a Pussy Wagon borrowed from Quentin Tarantino and somewhere in there Lady Gaga makes a sandwich and gets naked. The visual experience is incredible. But what does it mean? Lady Gaga, apparently, didn’t figure that out until she was halfway through making it. Here’s what she told Ryan Seacrest about the “Let’s Make a Sandwich” interlude:

“It kind of comes in out of nowhere, but now that I watch it, in retrospect, the way that it works into the video, and the commentary on kind of being over-fed communication and advertisements and food in this country. I think it all kind of really makes sense by the end.”

The political commentary comes after the visual image is conceived:

“It became about transsexual women at the beginning of the video, it became about making fun of American hallmarks with soda cans and cigarettes and mayonnaise and bread.”

With any kind of art, images can precede or create meaning. The politics behind any painting or novel have as much to do with the viewer as they do with the product itself; images are politically salient only because of the discussions and actions they inspire. Both the artist’s motives and the audience’s opinions matter when the political impact of a piece of art is weighed.

So let’s turn to the feminist audience. Feminist bloggers and critics have picked apart the gender, race and economic politics, as this epic post on Feministe shows. Salient political critiques have been made by people primarily concerned with the politics — people caught up in the movement for racial, sexual and economic rights.

And that makes the critics different from Gaga herself. While the pop goddess has come out in support of gay and queer rights and has (apparently) called herself a feminist, she believes primarily in the cause of pop itself:

“I have a vow to myself to kind of desperately serve show business until I die, because I believe in it so much. I’ll have to think of even more exciting ways to do it the next time around.”

Gaga’s business is to create outrageous images — to push boundaries, to serve pop –  and that is what she has done. With “Telephone,” she has given us a saturated visual landscape upon which to hash out our own thoughts about gender and race. She’s also given misogynist audiences an eyeful of skinny white women dancing in g-strings. It’s a generous helping of images. But it’s up to us to decide what they will mean.

Amy Littlefield is the Music Editor at Gender Across Borders.

Like Gender Across Borders on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter and Tumblr. Subscribe to our monthly newsletter. UPDATE: to take part in our survey regarding international feminism, click here.

7 Comments

  • Jukebox Heroine
    April 16, 2010
    10:07 am

    Exactly! Great post and thank you so much for mentioning my blog’s critique of the video. =)

  • Jessica Mack
    April 18, 2010
    7:15 pm

    Great post. I felt like it was all a little too convenient that after Gaga’s video came out there were endless bravas of how feminist it was… I think you’re right to point out that her use of imagery and message isn’t always conscious, and certainly not consciously feminist. Perhaps we read that into it, because we want to — and sometimes it work, sometimes it doesn’t. It occurs to me that we seem to really want to find links between pop culture and feminism, especially those of us who have a foot in each world, because one often denigrates what the other seeks to rectify. Perhaps searching for feminist reflection in Gaga’s Telephone…and other countless examples…is our way of making ourselves feel less guilty for enjoying the sheer pop-ness of it, despite the fact that we call ourselves feminists.

    • Amy Littlefield
      April 18, 2010
      8:19 pm

      Thanks for the comments! Jessica, I think you may be onto something about the relationship between pop and feminism — pop so often attacks feminism, by its very nature, and feminists have to dig pretty deep to find positive meaning in most pop songs. But I like to think that as feminists, we have the power to turn pop around by interpreting it in our own way. What would two women making out mean in a world without patriarchy, for example? Then again, maybe I am just trying to make myself feel better about dancing along…

      • Jessica Mack
        April 19, 2010
        8:45 pm

        I agree, it’s hard. It took me a long time to stop feeling guilty as a child for reading Teen Magazine and still feeling like I can stand up for myself and aspire to be a strong woman… I love dancing to Lady Gaga too.

  • Anna K Marshall
    April 19, 2010
    8:26 am

    Amy, I really like your post. Thanks for introducing me to the discussion.

  • Maria Price
    May 28, 2010
    6:28 pm

    I am initially disgusted when I see the video; mainly because I feel as a feminist you aren’t going around parading your body as the main attraction. To think that putting together a song with a video that barely relates to it and creates a subculture based on sultry temptations and confusion is supposed to say, “Hey, woman can do wonderful things in the world.” I mean they are in jail and not out trying to campaign for women’s rights in Saudi. Lady Gaga wants us to be curious and drool over the skin and sin….and to be attracted to women. She has wonderful musical talent, but much like Marilyn Manson she thrives on shock factor and the dynamics of tough or lesbian women. These women are more indie/independent/free-loving than feminists.

    • Elizabeth Switaj
      May 29, 2010
      11:04 am

      Maria, could you expand a bit on this–”These women are more indie/independent/free-loving than feminists.”? I’m not really sure what you mean by that.

Latest Global Gender Justice News

  • New Project! We need your help!

    New Project! We need your help!

  • Start Improving the World: Goodbye, Gender Across Borders

    Start Improving the World: Goodbye, Gender Across Borders

  • Global Feminist Link Love: April 21 – 27

    Global Feminist Link Love: April 21 – 27

  • Male, female, hetero, homo: does the binarism really exist or are we making it up?

    Male, female, hetero, homo: does the binarism really exist or are we making it up?

  • Essentialism, constructionism, and why I like plaid

    Essentialism, constructionism, and why I like plaid

  • Understanding my sexuality through queer theory

    Understanding my sexuality through queer theory

  • Dangers of identity politics: does science hold all the answers?

    Dangers of identity politics: does science hold all the answers?

  • Profile of a “Gaysian”

    Profile of a “Gaysian”

  • “Yes I am too, but am I really?” On queerness and socialization.

    “Yes I am too, but am I really?” On queerness and socialization.

  • Welcome to the series “Born this way? The role of the nature vs nurture debate in sexual identity formation and acceptance”!

    Welcome to the series “Born this way? The role of the nature vs nurture debate in sexual identity formation and acceptance”!

  • Unpacking my daddy issues

    Unpacking my daddy issues

  • Women’s Solidarity: Speaking With One Voice for Equality

    Women’s Solidarity: Speaking With One Voice for Equality

  • Report Addresses Gender Gap in London

    Report Addresses Gender Gap in London

  • Integration, Honor and Women in Germany

    Integration, Honor and Women in Germany

  • A Question of Royalty: How Black Princesses are Faring on the International Stage

    A Question of Royalty: How Black Princesses are Faring on the International Stage

  • Global Feminist Link Love: April 14-20

    Global Feminist Link Love: April 14-20

  • Women in the Middle

    Women in the Middle

  • Malawi: New President and New Media

    Malawi: New President and New Media

  • Illusions of Abandonment: Euro-orphans in Poland’s Immigrant Families

    Illusions of Abandonment: Euro-orphans in Poland’s Immigrant Families

  • Chasing Elusive Dreams: The Quandary of Zimbabwean Women

    Chasing Elusive Dreams: The Quandary of Zimbabwean Women

← previous next →
Gender Across Borders
  • Mission
  • Contact Us
  • Comments Policy
    search:
    © Copyright 2013 — Gender Across Borders. All Rights Reserved Designed by WPZOOM