
Nina Hartley, image from Humanist
This past week, Jezebel posted an item that used two seemingly contradictory terms to catch the eye: feminist and porn star. To me, the undeniable shock value was a bit gratuitous, since the woman didn’t mentioned one thing about feminism, nor could we verify that her “self proclaimed” title had any meaning at all. The post was a stupid video about a retired pornstar who gave her exotic cat testicle implants after neutering him. She was a buffoon.
Too bad they didn’t call attention to a more thought-provoking and articulate “feminist pornstar” interviewed for Humanist Magazine, Nina Hartley. In the interview, Hartley discusses her religious views (she’s a devout atheist), her views of human rights (she is a staunch feminist), and her views on sexuality (she’s a pornstar, duh). She is a picture of articulateness, thoughtfulness, and contrast for many feminists who find porn deeply troubling. I, for one, am not one of those.
Nina Hartley is whip smart feminist and someone who has sex on camera, for money, and has done so for decades. To her, those ideas are entirely compatible. She decries “radical feminists,” whom she describes as basically a group of crazy man haters, for lashing out at porn and making her special brand of pornstar-feminism that much harder to peddle. “Radical feminists” (who is she talking about exactly, I wonder?) give feminism a bad rep for everyone else, says Hartley. They hate men, they hate pleasure, they hate the voluntary entrance into anything which has at one time been co-opted by men to objectify women. Say wha? Hmm, now we are left with a short list.
I’m intrigued by her words about radical feminists. On the one hand, I think the very essence of feminism should and has to be radicalism. There’s a distinct value in having radicalism in a field such as feminism, that hinges on the push back against the norm, against the box, against the accepted and moderate. I like that Hartley has the guts to offer this feminist critique as a feminist herself, from within a field that is so often loathed by feminists – porn, that is. I like that Hartley is also an atheist which, I think, also takes a certain feminist chutzpah. She is a powerful symbol of both empowerment and confound. Read the rest of this entry →